🔗 Share this article

While 2024 presidential bid, Donald Trump pledged to avoid expensive and frequently catastrophic foreign armed engagements like the cases of Iraq and Afghanistan. This promise was a key component of his non-interventionist “America first” policy. Yet not long after taking office, American military units carried out airstrikes in Yemen and Iran. Looking southward, Trump warned to take control of the Panama Canal. Currently, the Pentagon is preparing for potential operations against so-called “terrorist” narco-trafficking organizations deep inside Colombia and Mexico. Most urgent worry is a potential renewed administration attempt to enforce a new government in Venezuela.

The Venezuelan Response and Escalating Tensions

Nicolás Maduro, the country's hard-left strongman leader, claims that this campaign is already begun. He states that the US is waging a covert conflict on his nation after multiple deadly strikes against Venezuelan vessels in international waters. Trump last week informed Congress that the United States is engaged in “armed conflict” with narco-trafficking groups. He alleges, without providing evidence, that the targeted vessels were carrying illegal narcotics bound for the US – and that the Venezuelan leader bears responsibility. He has issued a multimillion-dollar reward for Maduro’s capture.

Regional nations are anxiously watching a major American armed forces buildup around Venezuela, including warships, F-35 combat aircraft, a submarine and 2,200 marines. These powerful assets are hardly much use for drug interdiction. However they could be deployed for attack, or to support commando operations and airstrikes. Recently, Venezuela accused Washington of unauthorized entry by several F-35s. The president says he is preparing a state of emergency to defend citizens if Venezuela comes under attack from the American empire.

Analyzing the Reasons Behind the Moves

What exactly is Trump doing? Drug smuggling is a serious problem – yet taking lives arbitrarily on the high seas, although common and difficult to prosecute, remains illegal. And anyway, United Nations reports says the majority of illegal drugs entering the US comes from Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, and is mostly not trafficked through Venezuela. The president, a former draft-dodger, likes to act the strong leader. Currently, he is trying to deport Venezuelan migrants, a large number originally fled to America due to economic measures he previously imposed. Experts suggest he desires Venezuela’s abundant oil, gas and natural wealth.

It’s true that Trump and John Bolton, attempted to oust Maduro back in 2019 in an event Caracas described as an overthrow attempt. It’s also true, the president's 2024 re-election victory was broadly denounced as fraudulent. If allowed to vote freely, Venezuelans would likely vote out him. And, opposing ideologies play a role, as well. Maduro, poor heir to his predecessor's Bolivarian revolution, is offensive to Trump’s imperial vision of an American-led western hemisphere, where the 1823 Monroe doctrine is revived and free-market capitalism operates without restraint.

Absence of Coherent Strategy

However considering his inept blundering on other major international matters, the probable reason for the president's actions is that, typically, he hasn’t got a clue about his actions – regarding Caracas or Latin America as a whole. No strategy exists. He throws his weight about, takes rash misjudgments, stokes fear about immigrants and forms policies on whether he approves of foreign counterparts. In 2019, with Maduro on the ropes, Trump backed down. Today, large-scale armed involvement in Venezuela remains unlikely. More probable is a heightened pressure campaign involving destabilisation, penalties, maritime strikes, and air and commando raids.

Far from undermining and marginalizing the regime, the US may achieve the reverse. The president is already using the situation to seize authoritarian emergency authority and rally popular support with patriotic appeals for national solidarity. The president's aggression of additional left-leaning Latin American nations – like Colombia – and presumptuous support for conservative leaders in Argentina and El Salvador – is provoking pushback across the continent, too. The majority of nations detest the thought of a return to the past era of American meddling in the hemisphere.

Latin American Reaction and Diplomatic Setbacks

The administration's attempt to use punitive tariffs and restrictions to strong-arm Brazil into granting amnesty to its former hard-right president Jair Bolsonaro failed dramatically last month. Massive protests took to the streets in Brazilian urban centers to protect what they rightly saw as an assault on national independence and legal principles. Public support for the new president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, soared. “We are not, and never again will we be, a dependent state,” he stated. The Brazilian leader told Trump, essentially, to back off. Later, at their meeting at the UN summit, Trump retreated and played nice.

The perception of a great leap backwards in inter-American relations increases inevitably. “His administration views the region mainly as a security threat, associating it with narcotics trade, criminal networks and incoming migration,” a noted expert warned recently. “The US approach is fundamentally adversarial, favoring independent moves and dominance rather than cooperation,” she added, noting: “The region is being treated less as a peer and rather as a zone of control to be controlled according to US strategic interests.”

Hawkish Officials and Rising Language

The president's hardline aides are part of the problem: especially Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, and Marco Rubio, a former lawmaker for Florida who is secretary of state and security advisor. For Rubio, a longtime opponent of socialist governments in Cuba and Nicaragua, Maduro is unfinished business. Justifying the boat attacks, he stated: “Interdiction doesn’t work. What will stop them is when you blow them up … This will continue.” From the top US diplomat, this is quite a statement.

Future Implications

Trump’s efforts to reprise the position of Latin American neighbourhood policeman, emulating ex-leader Theodore Roosevelt – an interventionist serial interventionist – are regressive, dangerous and self-defeating. In the future, the big winner will most likely be Beijing, an increasingly influential player, economic partner and leading member of the international bloc of nations. While America severs ties across the world, Trump is making China rise in influence.